TOEFL 2026 · WRITING TASK GUIDE
TOEFL Writing Task 3 – Academic Discussion
Understand exactly how the Academic Discussion task works in the new TOEFL 2026 writing section. This page explains the format, timing, 0–5 scoring scale, strategies, and a full sample response.
Get Premium to access full course + 30 full mock tests
Watch the full 11 min lecture and the complete 7-hour TOEFL 2026 course.
Get PremiumVideo lecture · 11 min
Writing Task 3: Write for an Academic Discussion
TOEFL 2026 Writing · 5 lectures · 1hr 10min total
Show full lecture transcript
Writing Task 3 format, timing and word count
In this last lecture of our course, we will talk about Writing Task 3, the academic discussion. This is the only task in the new TOEFL format that was carried over from the previous, 2025 format of the TOEFL. Let's dive into the details. In this task, you're participating in a discussion hosted by your professor. You will see two messages from two other participants, usually your groupmates or other students. You have to respond to their ideas and form your own opinion.
You have 10 minutes to write your response, and you should aim to write at least 100 words. This is actually a requirement from ETS: your response should be no shorter than 100 words. The best responses are from 120 to 140 words, so it's best to aim for at least 130 words in this task.
How the academic discussion is scored
What about the scoring of the academic discussion? If your position is clear, you strongly support one of your classmates' positions with specific examples, and you have a clear logical flow and accurate language, you'll get 5 points. If your position and support are mostly clear, though with minor lapses in detail and language, you'll get 4 points.
If you have a basic position with limited and general support and noticeable errors or disorganization, you'll get 3 points. You'll get 2 points if your position is unclear, your support is insufficient, and you make frequent mistakes.
Strategy 1: Use a logical structure
Let's go to strategies. Strategy number one in this task is to use a logical structure. How should you structure your response? First of all, you have to state your position: whether you agree or disagree with one of the students. Then you have to state supporting reasons, preferably with examples. And then you make a conclusion based on the examples you used in your post.
For example, you can start with "I disagree with John's view because..." Then you can go to the reasons and say "I contend that...", "I maintain that...", or "From my perspective, something is true" or "this is not true." For the summary, you can say "As a result," "To sum up," or "That's why."
It's important to mention that in this task you don't have to add a summary; you don't need a separate paragraph dedicated to it. The most important part is to have a logical structure in your response, where you actually explain your position and state whether you agree or disagree with the other speakers. You have to ensure that your answer fully expresses your opinion and provides substantial support, not just a claim.
Strategy 2: Use concrete examples
That is what the next strategy is about: you have to use concrete examples. It's better not to use statements like "Technology helps education," period. That's not right. You have to develop your ideas and use examples. Sometimes they can be made-up cases or situations that never happened, but you have to support your opinion. This is the point of this task.
For example, you can say: "When my friend used an online science program, she completed virtual chemistry experiments at her own pace and understood the concepts better than in a crowded lab." "Reading helps people learn" is too general a point. It's better to say: "For instance, when I began reading short news articles in English every night, my vocabulary grew quickly, and I became more confident during class discussions."
Strategy 3: Use and vary transitions
Strategy number 3: use transitions. We have already talked about this strategy many times, and transitions are a big part of a properly structured response. If you follow the main strategy of keeping a short introduction stating whether you agree or disagree with one of the speakers and then following up with reasons, you will always use transitions. And it is very natural, because you have a picture of the structure of your response in your mind. You understand that you have to write an introduction, then use some linking words to jump into the reasons, and then proceed to the summary. All these parts are always linked by transitions.
So you can use "however," "nevertheless," "consequently," or "in contrast." It's recommended to vary transitions and avoid repeating the same one. For example, you can say "Nevertheless, I maintain that the benefits of mandatory service outweigh these concerns" or "However, I still think..." and then proceed with some reasons. It's important to vary your transitions because your response is relatively short in this task. If you repeat linking words, it will be obvious, because your paragraphs will often start with the same linking words, and this will lower your score.
Sample question: how can a company have a positive impact on society?
Now let's go to an actual example of this task. Let's say your professor is hosting a business discussion. He says: "Next week, we are going to spend a lot of time in class discussing the positive and negative ways in which companies affect the world around us. Before we start talking about that in class, I want to hear what you think about the topic. So here is a question for the message board: In your opinion, what is the best way for a company to have a positive impact on society?"
Now you have a minute to check out the arguments and think about your own opinion. You can decide whether you agree with Jessica or Mike, and you can think about reasons to support your opinion. You don't need to write now, but you have to come up with a concept of what you're going to write in the time provided for this task. And then we're going to proceed to the sample answer.
Sample answer and analysis
OK, great. Now let's proceed to the sample answer: "I strongly agree with John's idea that charitable donations are a way to quickly address the serious problems that we are facing. I would add that some of these problems, like homelessness and food insecurity, are more serious than they have ever been, so companies certainly have a role to play. Even a small donation can save someone's life. Sara raised the relevant point that philanthropy might help businesses attract new customers, but she didn't mention that nowadays people's purchasing decisions are mostly based on cost. Many people prefer to buy the cheapest products available, even if they are sold by unethical companies. Because the economy is in such rough shape, they just can't afford to think about a business's reputation when they are shopping."
As you can see, in this sample response we used an introduction, and the introduction states that you agree with John's idea that charitable donations are a way to quickly address the serious problems we are facing. Next, after you state your opinion, you also give your own reasons. In this case, it is stated: "I would add that some of these problems, like homelessness and food insecurity, are more serious than they have ever been." And that's why companies certainly have a role to play in this problem.
Then you comment on Sara's opinion. You say that Sara raised the relevant point that philanthropy might help businesses attract new customers, but she didn't mention that nowadays people's purchasing decisions are mostly based on cost. So you give your opinion on Sara's message, and then you provide reasons why you think her opinion is incorrect or incomplete. You say that the economy is in such rough shape that most people cannot afford to think about a business's reputation, and they just purchase products based on cost.
As you can see, there is no direct summary of your opinion. In your response, you can write a summary, or you can just comment on the messages from other students. But the most important thing is to follow an accurate structure, to logically present your attitude to the other students' messages, and to provide your own opinion with supporting reasons why you think this is true, or why you think Sara is wrong or John is right in this case.
As you can see, the word count for this answer is 127, which is the recommended length for your response. As I said, it's better to write at least 120 words to get the full score in this task.
Final advice: practice with the strategies and templates
So this was the last task in our course. After this block, as after every other block, you'll get practice sets of questions. So use the strategies provided, and use the templates that you'll see in the presentations in this course to practice. It was a pleasure for me to tell you about the new format of the TOEFL, and I hope that all the materials provided in this lecture will help you get the highest score possible on your exam and achieve your goals.
On this page
Academic Discussion sample questions
Practice with full Academic Discussion tasks (prompt, classmates' posts, and a sample answer):
1. What is Academic Discussion?
Academic Discussion is Writing Task 3 in the TOEFL 2026 format. It looks like an online course discussion board. On the screen, you see:
- A short professor's post that introduces a topic and asks a question.
- Two messages from classmates who share different opinions.
Your job is to write your own message that responds to the professor's question and engages with the classmates' ideas. You are not writing a formal essay; you are writing a focused, academic-style comment.
Task overview
- You're "participating in a discussion hosted by your professor."
- You see two messages from other students.
- You should acknowledge or respond to others' ideas and give your opinion.
- You have 10 minutes and should write at least 100 words.
2. Task details, timing & scoring
How long you have
- Total time: 10 minutes for one discussion task.
- Recommended length: 100–140 words to give enough support without running out of time.
- Good pacing:
- 1–2 minutes: read the prompt and two student posts.
- 7–8 minutes: write your response.
- Last 1–2 minutes: revise quickly.
0–5 scale
The Academic Discussion scoring levels are:
- 5 – Clear position, strong support with specific examples, logical flow, accurate language.
- 4 – Position and support mostly clear; minor lapses in detail or language.
- 3 – Basic position with limited or general support; noticeable errors or weak organization.
- 2 – Unclear position or insufficient support; frequent errors.
- 1 – Minimal, off-topic, or very hard to understand.
- 0 – No response.
What raters look for
- Do you clearly state your position (which idea you support or your own view)?
- Do you support it with specific reasons and concrete examples?
- Do you connect your ideas logically with transitions?
- Is your language accurate enough that your message is easy to follow?
3. What Academic Discussion tests
This task checks whether you can participate in a university-style discussion: understanding different opinions, taking a clear position, and backing it up with reasons and examples.
Reading & reacting
- Understanding the professor's question and classmates' posts.
- Agreeing or disagreeing in a respectful, academic way.
Organizing arguments
- Clear structure: position → reasons → conclusion.
- Logical flow between sentences and paragraphs.
Using examples & transitions
- Supporting points with concrete, personal or observed examples rather than general statements.
- Using transitions such as However, Nevertheless, Consequently, In contrast.
4. Core strategies for Writing Task 3
Follow a clear logical structure
A simple but powerful structure:
- Position: Say whether you agree or disagree with one student (or partly with each).
Example: I agree with Jessica that companies should focus on their operations rather than only on charitable donations. - Supporting reasons: Give 2–3 reasons, each explained with 1–2 sentences.
- Conclusion: Finish with one sentence that restates your view.
Example: For these reasons, improving daily operations is the most effective way for companies to help society.
Useful phrases for giving reasons: I contend that… / I maintain that… / From my perspective…
Use concrete examples, not vague statements
Compare "weak" general statements with "better" specific examples.
- Instead of "Technology helps education," write: For example, my friend used an online science program to complete virtual chemistry experiments at her own pace, which helped her understand concepts better than in a crowded lab.
- Instead of "Reading helps people learn," give a concrete habit and result.
- Instead of "Traveling teaches you about cultures," describe one specific trip and what you learned.
On the test, use experiences from your life, your friends, or news stories. Specific details show higher-level writing.
Connect ideas with strong transitions
Helpful transitions: However, Nevertheless, Consequently, In contrast.
- Use However / Nevertheless to introduce a contrasting idea.
- Use Consequently to show a result.
- Use In contrast when you oppose a classmate's opinion.
- Vary them; do not repeat the same one in every sentence.
Example: Nevertheless, I maintain that the benefits of mandatory service outweigh these concerns.
Respond directly to classmates
Remember this is a discussion, not a stand-alone essay.
- Mention classmates by name: Jessica makes a strong point that…, but Mike is right that…
- Agree with some parts and disagree with others, but explain why.
- Show that you read both posts and that your ideas are part of the conversation.
5. Example prompt & sample response
Here is a full example of a business-related discussion about how companies can have a positive impact on society, plus a sample student response.
Business discussion – prompt
On the discussion board, the professor explains that the next class will look at positive and negative ways companies affect the world. He asks: In your opinion, what is the best way for a company to have a positive impact on society?
Jessica argues that companies should make their operations more socially and environmentally responsible—for example, solving environmental problems and inspiring other companies by their behavior.
Mike agrees that operations matter but believes companies should focus on charitable giving, because donations can help people immediately while big operational changes may take years.
Sample response
The sample student post supports the idea that charitable donations are a fast way to address serious problems like homelessness and food insecurity. It also responds to another classmate's point about marketing benefits and argues that many people still choose the cheapest products because of economic pressure.
Key features of the sample (127 words):
- Clear position in the first sentence: I strongly agree with John's idea that charitable donations…
- Concrete examples of serious problems (homelessness, food insecurity) and how donations help.
- Direct engagement with another student's claim about attracting customers.
- Logical explanation of why that claim may not be completely true (many shoppers focus on cost).
This response matches the "5" description: clear position, strong support with examples, logical flow, and accurate language.
6. Practice routine for Academic Discussion
Step 1 – Collect prompts
- Create professor questions such as: "What is the best way for cities to reduce traffic?", "Should universities require community service?"
- Write two short "classmate" posts with different opinions.
Step 2 – Write timed responses
- Set a timer for 10 minutes and write your discussion post.
- Aim for 100–140 words, following the position → reasons → conclusion structure.
Step 3 – Check for examples & transitions
- Underline your main reasons. Did you include at least one concrete example for each?
- Circle transitions like However, In contrast, Consequently. Add more if your writing feels "list-like."
Step 4 – Compare to the scoring scale
- Use the 5–1 descriptors above to rate your own work.
- Ask: "What change would move this from a 3 to a 4? From a 4 to a 5?"
- Focus especially on strengthening support with more specific details and clearer logic.
8. Frequently asked questions
Where to practice Academic Discussion?
More than 100+ Academic Discussion samples with scoring and explanations you can find on testsucceed.com.
Is Academic Discussion the same as the old TOEFL Integrated Writing task?
No. The old integrated task combined reading, listening, and writing a summary. Academic Discussion is shorter and looks like an online message board: you read a question and two posts, then respond with your own opinion.
Do I need to use formal academic language?
You should sound academic and respectful, but not extremely formal. Contractions and first-person pronouns (I, my) are fine. Focus on clear grammar and logical organization.
What if I only summarize the classmates' posts?
Summarizing is not enough. The rubric requires a clear position and supporting reasons. You must add your own ideas and examples, not just repeat what others said.
How many paragraphs should I write?
There is no fixed number, but 2–3 short paragraphs work well: one for your position, one or two for reasons and examples. Separate paragraphs make your ideas easier to follow.
What if I make grammar mistakes?
Some mistakes are okay, especially at levels 3–4. To reach level 5, errors should be minor and not interfere with understanding. Use your last minute to fix verb tenses, subject–verb agreement, and punctuation.
Get Premium to receive this course for free. Premium includes 30+ full mock tests.
Get Premium
Preview Course