Both writing tasks, with model answers and the reasons they work.
Two prompts in the official shape, each with a model answer inside the 150-200 word band and a note on why it scores. Write yours first, then open the model.
Both CELPIP writing tasks are rated on Content/Coherence, Vocabulary, Readability, Task Fulfillment.
Time
27 minutes
Length
150-200 words
You recently took a six-week evening course at your local college. The course was cancelled after four weeks because the instructor left, and you have not been told what happens next.
Write an email to the course coordinator. In your email:
Sample answer — about 150-200 words
Dear Ms. Lavoie,
I am writing about the Introduction to Bookkeeping course on Tuesday evenings, which I registered for in September. The course ran for four weeks and then stopped after we were told that the instructor had left the college. Since then I have not had any message about what happens next, and the course page online still shows the original schedule.
Could you tell me what the plan is for the remaining two sessions? I would like to know whether a replacement instructor has been found, and if so, when those sessions will be held. Several of us arranged childcare for Tuesday evenings and would need some notice.
If the course cannot be completed this term, I would be glad to take the missing sessions in the winter term at no extra cost. A partial refund would also be reasonable, though I would rather finish the course than get the money back.
Thank you for your help.
Yours sincerely,
Alex Romero
Time
26 minutes
Length
150-200 words
Your municipality is surveying residents about an unused lot near the town centre. It has budget to develop it in one of two ways:
Choose the option you prefer and explain why it is the better use of the lot.
Sample answer — about 150-200 words
I would choose Option A, the park, and I think it is the better choice even for people who drive.
The first reason is that the lot is the only open space left in the centre. Everything around it is built on, and once it is paved it will not become a park later — that decision is effectively permanent. A park, on the other hand, can be adapted. The playground can be replaced with something else in twenty years if the neighbourhood changes.
The second reason is who actually uses the centre. The shops there depend on people walking between them, and families with small children stay far longer when there is somewhere to stop. Sixty parking spaces would bring sixty cars, but a park brings people who are already on foot and in no hurry.
I understand the parking argument, because finding a space on a Saturday is genuinely difficult. But parking can be built on the edge of the centre, where land is cheaper, and this particular lot cannot be replaced.