Abstract questions, deliberate disagreement, and the part of the test where a strong candidate finally gets to show what they can do.
The examiner takes the Part 2 topic and moves it away from your own life towards society, trends and abstractions. It lasts four to five minutes and is a genuine two-way discussion.
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Time | 4–5 minutes |
| Link to Part 2 | Same broad topic, treated abstractly |
| Question style | Analytical — compare, speculate, evaluate |
| Preparation time | None |
Explaining opinions, analysing, discussing and speculating. This is the part that distinguishes a 6.5 from an 8, because it demands the conditional, comparative and hedging language the earlier parts never force out of you.
The examiner may disagree with you deliberately. That is a prompt to defend or qualify your position, not a signal that you were wrong.
Topic: Living Conditions
These are not questions about you. They are questions about people in general, and they want a position, a reason and a qualification — it depends on, although, in most cases.
Give a balanced answer — some people think X, others Y, and it depends on Z. A considered non-position is fully creditable.
Linguistically, usually yes. It demands abstract and conditional language that the cue card does not.
Longer than Part 1 — roughly three to five sentences, developed with reasons.
Practise this task with real material on the IELTS Speaking samples page, or review how it is marked on the Speaking scoring page.